>>
>> My mistake . . . I was referring to the black lady who was interviewed on
>TV (a
>> broadcast I personally saw) . . . not Mr. Hartridge. I'm searching the
>web now
>> to see if there is a video of the interview I saw. Sorry about that . . .
>
>Ok, please let us know. Everything I've been able to find refers to Mr.
>Hartridge as the sole juror to have commented publicly on the trial.
>

Me, too--very frustrating since I saw it with my own eyes, and heard the legal
analyst
commenting that it would be grounds for an appeal. Can't find it using google
.. . .
but still watching TV news and looking.




www.Rosspilot.com

"Rosspilot" > wrote in message
...
> >>
> >> My mistake . . . I was referring to the black lady who was interviewed
on
> >TV (a
> >> broadcast I personally saw) . . . not Mr. Hartridge. I'm searching the
> >web now
> >> to see if there is a video of the interview I saw. Sorry about that .
.. .
> >
> >Ok, please let us know. Everything I've been able to find refers to Mr.
> >Hartridge as the sole juror to have commented publicly on the trial.
> >
>
> Me, too--very frustrating since I saw it with my own eyes, and heard the
legal
> analyst
> commenting that it would be grounds for an appeal. Can't find it using
google
> . . .
> but still watching TV news and looking.

Perhaps you mis-remembered the juror's gender, and perhaps either the TV
report took the "I would have liked to have heard from her" quote out of
context (sensationalizing the remark by misleadingly omitting "But it didn't
make a difference"--a majority of the print reports did precisely that), or
else perhaps your own recollection inadvertently performed that truncation
of the quote.

--Gary

>
>
>
>
> www.Rosspilot.com
>
>

>
>> >> My mistake . . . I was referring to the black lady who was interviewed
>on
>> >TV (a
>> >> broadcast I personally saw) . . . not Mr. Hartridge. I'm searching the
>> >web now
>> >> to see if there is a video of the interview I saw. Sorry about that .
>. .
>> >
>> >Ok, please let us know. Everything I've been able to find refers to Mr.
>> >Hartridge as the sole juror to have commented publicly on the trial.
>> >
>>
>> Me, too--very frustrating since I saw it with my own eyes, and heard the
>legal
>> analyst
>> commenting that it would be grounds for an appeal. Can't find it using
>google
>> . . .
>> but still watching TV news and looking.
>
>Perhaps you mis-remembered the juror's gender, and perhaps either the TV
>report took the "I would have liked to have heard from her" quote out of
>context (sensationalizing the remark by misleadingly omitting "But it didn't
>make a difference"--a majority of the print reports did precisely that), or
>else perhaps your own recollection inadvertently performed that truncation
>of the quote.
>

Distinctly possible . . . but would a man be wearing a hate with flowers all
over it (as the one I saw being interviewed)?

Maybe I'm hallucinating . . . <G>

Was the male juror a very fat black man?


www.Rosspilot.com

"Rosspilot" > wrote in message
...
> >
> >> >> My mistake . . . I was referring to the black lady who was
interviewed
> >on
> >> >TV (a
> >> >> broadcast I personally saw) . . . not Mr. Hartridge. I'm searching
the
> >> >web now
> >> >> to see if there is a video of the interview I saw. Sorry about that
..
> >. .
> >> >
> >> >Ok, please let us know. Everything I've been able to find refers to
Mr.
> >> >Hartridge as the sole juror to have commented publicly on the trial.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Me, too--very frustrating since I saw it with my own eyes, and heard
the
> >legal
> >> analyst
> >> commenting that it would be grounds for an appeal. Can't find it using
> >google
> >> . . .
> >> but still watching TV news and looking.
> >
> >Perhaps you mis-remembered the juror's gender, and perhaps either the TV
> >report took the "I would have liked to have heard from her" quote out of
> >context (sensationalizing the remark by misleadingly omitting "But it
didn't
> >make a difference"--a majority of the print reports did precisely that),
or
> >else perhaps your own recollection inadvertently performed that
truncation
> >of the quote.
> >
>
> Distinctly possible . . . but would a man be wearing a hate with flowers
all
> over it (as the one I saw being interviewed)?
>
> Maybe I'm hallucinating . . . <G>
>
> Was the male juror a very fat black man?

Maybe you have a gay marriage news bit mixed up with Martha.


>
>
> www.Rosspilot.com
>
>

"Rosspilot" > wrote in message
...
> >
> >> >> My mistake . . . I was referring to the black lady who was
interviewed
> >on
> >> >TV (a
> >> >> broadcast I personally saw) . . . not Mr. Hartridge. I'm searching
the
> >> >web now
> >> >> to see if there is a video of the interview I saw. Sorry about that
..
> >. .
> >> >
> >> >Ok, please let us know. Everything I've been able to find refers to
Mr.
> >> >Hartridge as the sole juror to have commented publicly on the trial.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Me, too--very frustrating since I saw it with my own eyes, and heard
the
> >legal
> >> analyst
> >> commenting that it would be grounds for an appeal. Can't find it using
> >google
> >> . . .
> >> but still watching TV news and looking.
> >
> >Perhaps you mis-remembered the juror's gender, and perhaps either the TV
> >report took the "I would have liked to have heard from her" quote out of
> >context (sensationalizing the remark by misleadingly omitting "But it
didn't
> >make a difference"--a majority of the print reports did precisely that),
or
> >else perhaps your own recollection inadvertently performed that
truncation
> >of the quote.
> >
>
> Distinctly possible . . . but would a man be wearing a hate with flowers
all
> over it (as the one I saw being interviewed)?
>
> Maybe I'm hallucinating . . . <G>
>
> Was the male juror a very fat black man?

Dunno about his appearance, but the reports do say he spoke on TV. By now,
several other jurors have been quoted too, but I still haven't seen any
claim that Stewart's silence was a factor in the verdict. On the contrary,
the jurors emphasize that they took seriously their responsibility to
carefully consider the evidence on its merits, and to resist extraneous
influences.

--Gary

>
>
> www.Rosspilot.com
>
>